Reduced Debt.

Reduced Debt.

Hey there! Thanks for dropping by our Site! Subscribe to get Tips Become Debt Free via email!, and Learn More about Going From Debt to Wealth!

Posts Tagged ‘America’

Tom Ramstack – AHN News Legal Correspondent

Washington, D.C., United States (AHN) – A congressional committee took on part of the nation’s illegal immigration problem Thursday during a hearing on guest worker programs.

A House Judiciary subcommittee heard from witnesses from state agricultural programs in California, Georgia and North Carolina who support the idea of using foreign workers to harvest their crops.

However, almost no one wants them to stay in the United States after they complete their work, which would add to a problem that has created about 12 million illegal immigrants.

“There is no numerical limit to H-2A temporary agricultural work visas, yet half of farm workers remain illegal immigrants,” Lamar Smith, chairman of the subcommittee on immigration policy enforcement, said at the hearing. “Why don’t more growers who have heavy demands for seasonal agricultural labor make use of the program? Well, in 2008, the Department of Labor concluded that the vast majority of growers find the H-2A program so plagued with problems that they avoid using it altogether.”

Farmers’ complaints about the guest worker program include the bureaucratic obstacles to obtaining the visas and the high cost of providing workers with housing, which is required.

A bill pending in Congress would allow states to administer their own version of a visa program that brings in foreign workers for seasonal farm work. The bill also would give permission for some foreigners to work year-round in the United States, but only for limited periods of time, such as two years.

State programs would reduce regulatory barriers and allow more workers to qualify for the visas, according to supporters of the proposal.

The U.S. Labor Department now administers the H-2A program of short-term visas for guest workers.

However, the Labor Department has been criticized for not administering it properly.

About 1 million guest workers reside in the United States while millions of others live in the country illegally.

Critics of the program say it should be expanded so there would not be much need for illegal immigrant workers.

The government could then monitor their presence and get them to leave the United States peacefully when their visas expire.

The alternative requires turning the borders into armed camps and forcibly deporting illegal immigrants who return within a few weeks.

“America needs an agricultural guest worker program that is fair to everyone it impacts – American growers, farm workers, consumers and guest workers,” Smith said. “The program must provide growers who want to do the right thing with a reliable source of legal labor. It must protect the livelihoods of American workers and the rights of guest workers. And it must keep in mind the pocketbooks of American families.”

The current guest worker program does not meet those goals, according to witnesses at the hearing Thursday.

Gary W. Black, a Georgia Department of Agriculture commissioner, said Georgia’s farmers who did not hire illegal immigrants experienced a labor shortage under the Labor Department’s guest worker program.

The Georgia Agriculture Department did a study last year that showed 26 percent of its farmers suffered a loss of income because of a labor shortage despite a high unemployment rate nationwide. The problems were most severe in the fruit and vegetable industries.

“Even with unemployment rates hovering around 10 percent, this task was not as easy as it would seem,” Black said.

He mentioned the case of a Georgia farmer who “had one employee that worked half a day one week and two half days the next week. This employee earned a total of $119. The employee walked off the job and did not return though plenty of work was available. In addition, the employee filed an unemployment claim, and the producer received notification that the employee was eligible for $235 weekly benefits for 17 weeks.”

Foreign workers, such as illegal immigrants, would not be entitled to unemployment insurance benefits.

During his 2008 presidential campaign, Barack Obama said he would make immigration reform a priority of his administration. He mentioned it again during his 2012 State of the Union address.

More recently, Obama admitted during an interview with the Spanish language television station Univision that he has not accomplished his immigration reform goals, which he blamed on obstruction by Republicans in Congress.

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on Labor Stories

Tejinder Singh – AHN News Correspondent

Washington, D.C., United States (AHN) – President Barack Obama on Thursday released ten states, from controversial burdens of the federal education law known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB), to go ahead with their reform programs as the country struggles to raise educational standards to compete on a global scale.

Addressing a select audience of state education officials, teachers, civil rights and business leaders, President Obama said, “After waiting far too long for Congress to act …We are giving 10 states, the first 10 states the green light to continue making the reforms that are best for them.”

With Congress dragging its feet over the rewrite of the NCLB law, which is five years overdue, the law is alleged to be driving the wrong behaviors, from teaching to the test to federally determined, one-size-fits-all interventions, according to the White House.

“We want high standards, and we’ll give you flexibility in return. We combine greater freedom with greater accountability,” said President Obama, adding, “Because what might work in Minnesota may not work in Kentucky — but every student should have the same opportunity to reach their potential.”

Appearing on the stage in the East Room of the White House along with the president, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in a statement, “Rather than dictating educational decisions from Washington, we want state and local educators to decide how to best meet the individual needs of students.”

All states had the chance to seek the waivers, Obama said, adding, “39 states have told us that they were interested. Some have already applied.”

Citing ten states approved for flexibility Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oklahoma, and Tennessee, the White House noted in a communique, “In exchange for this flexibility, these states have agreed to raise standards, improve accountability, and undertake essential reforms to improve teacher effectiveness.”

The announcement was welcomed by the National Education Association (NEA) calling the proposals as “temporary regulatory relief from some of No Child Left Behind’s mandates.”

“We’re encouraged by President Obama’s and Secretary Duncan’s efforts to provide NCLB waivers for relief,” said NEA President Dennis Van Roekel … But this is only a stopgap measure.”

Reiterating the NEA’s determination to “continue work with Congress on a comprehensive bill,” Van Roekel emphasized that future bills “must ensure that all students have access to quality education, well-rounded instruction, a safe and supportive learning environment, and access to qualified, caring and committed teachers.”

“Let’s make this happen,” concluded President Obama, noting, “The best ideas aren’t going to just come from here in Washington. They’re going to come from cities and towns from all across America. They’re going to come from teachers and principals and parents. They’re going to come from you who have a sense of what works and what doesn’t.”

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on Education Stories

Linda Young – AHN News Writer

Fort Worth, TX, United States (AHN) – American Airlines’ parent company on Wednesday warned its unions to expect deep cuts to the staff of 88,000.

AMR Corp. (AAMRQ) CEO Thomas Horton issued the warning during a presentation on the company’s cost-cutting plans.

American Airlines is the nation’s third largest airline.

While reportedly saying that American did not want to close any of its hubs and that it wants to remain an independent airline instead of being merged into another airline during the ongoing reorganization process stemming from its Nov. 29 bankruptcy filing. Horton also indicated there was a need to cut costs, which would result in a reduction in employees.

Company officials met with the three major unions that represent about 54,000 employees at American and its feeder airline, American Eagle. That included the Allied Pilots Association, the Association of Professional Flight Attendants and the Transport Workers union, which represents ground workers including mechanics.

There is an expectation that American will outsource major maintenance of airplanes to unsecured, low-cost facilities overseas. Other major airlines already do that.

Horton on Wednesday sent the following letter to all American Airlines employees:

Dear American Team:

Several weeks into our restructuring process we continue to make progress on a comprehensive plan to restore American to industry leadership, profitability, and growth. From my travels around the system and talking with so many of our folks, I know the fierce commitment we all share to making American a winner again. Today, I want to share with you the framework for the next steps on our path to transform American – not just to compete, but to win.

Change – a necessity, not a choice

As you know, our major competitors have used the restructuring process to overhaul their companies and become more competitive in every aspect of their business. Last week, these airlines announced their financial results, which highlighted, once again, a widening profit gap. Network carriers have benefited from investing their restructuring-driven profits in products and services that have helped drive revenue growth. And low cost airlines continue to benefit from the cost efficiency that has made them a force in our industry.

Now it is time for American to move forward on a decisive path. We are going to use the restructuring process to make the necessary changes to meet our challenges head on and capitalize fully on the solid foundation we’ve put in place.

Success – achievable goals, profits and growth

The key to our successful restructuring is a business plan with a clear objective. And that is to make American a world-class global airline – America’s flag carrier – that is competitive, profitable and growing. To do this, we must consistently deliver:

A superior customer experience that earns loyalty and drives revenue

A work environment that recognizes excellence and rewards success

Attractive financial returns for our investors and stakeholders

With financial and operational flexibility and an improved cost and capital structure, we plan to:

Renew and optimize our fleet by investing an average of about $2 billion per year in aircraft, so that by 2017 American’s mainline jet fleet will be the youngest in North America, with the versatility to match aircraft size to the markets we serve. This step is central to our transformation and means more profitable flying due to markedly improved fuel and maintenance costs, and higher revenue generation.

Build the scale of our network and alliances by increasing departures across American’s five key markets – Dallas/Fort Worth, Chicago, Miami, Los Angeles and New York – by 20 percent over the next five years, capitalizing on our loyal customer base and world-class alliance partners, and increasing international flying.

Modernize our brand, products and services by investing several hundred million dollars per year in enhancements that will, once again, make American the premier airline of high-value customers.

Our business plan demonstrates that we can achieve and sustain our objectives. Ultimately, we plan to achieve a $3 billion annual improvement, including:

Revenue improvements of $1 billion per year through network scale, fleet optimization, and product improvements.

Cost savings of over $2 billion, from restructuring debt and leases, grounding older planes, improving supplier contracts and other initiatives, and necessary employee-related changes.

Importantly, these financial improvements not only support our planned investments in our fleet, product and brand; they also enable us to further reduce our debt, becoming financially stronger so that American will be resilient and able to withstand future unforeseen events.

Success requires tough changes

The restructuring process allows us to spread the effects of cost savings as broadly and evenly as possible, but there is no avoiding the fact that the cost reductions will be deep. And there is no sugarcoating the effect on our people. Three principles will guide our approach:

Commitment to success – We have thoroughly analyzed the competition and the industry and what we must achieve is crystal clear. Competing and winning requires a financial improvement of more than $3 billion, and that, in turn, requires significant savings in employee-related costs – of more than $1.25 billion per year.

Fair and equitable – All workgroups will have total costs reduced by 20 percent, including management. While the savings from each work group will be achieved somewhat differently, each will experience the same percentage reduction.

Performance is rewarded – At American, everyone should be recognized for their contributions, aligned with overall company performance, and sharing in American’s success. That is why we envision a Profit Sharing plan that, beginning with the first dollar of pre-tax income, would pay awards totaling 15 percent of all pre-tax income.

I take full ownership of our business plan. It is very important, too, that we are all sure that the proposed changes are appropriate for each part of the company. In developing this plan I asked each business leader – Jim Ream, John Hale, and their colleagues in Operations, Tom Del Valle and his team in Airports, Craig Kreeger and Lauri Curtis in Customer Experience, and others – to take responsibility for the specific changes necessary to make American competitive and successful in each of their respective areas. I know you are concerned about how all of this will affect you. I have also asked each of these leaders to actively and directly communicate those changes to you. You will hear more detail later today as we share it with our union workgroups, and we will have more information for our non-union groups in weeks to come as we address feedback from them.

While we are now firmly on a path to a successful growing future, we must acknowledge the near-term pain these changes will require. That’s especially true because we will end this journey with many fewer people. But we will also preserve tens of thousands of jobs that would have been lost if we had not embarked on this path – and that’s a goal worth fighting for. As I’ve said before, our objective is to create the best outcome for the greatest possible number of people.

Renewal – risks and challenges

We have an extraordinary opportunity to create a new world-class airline, but we are also at great risk during this time. You have likely read or heard reports that there are those who wish to shrink our airline, close hubs or acquire our company or assets – all for the benefit of their own stakeholders. Still others may favor a breakup of American. I do not believe any of these outcomes are in the best interests of American, our people, or our stakeholders. But as I have said since the start of this process, there will be many parties with input into the outcome of our restructuring. The best way for us to assure that we are in control of our own future is to make the necessary changes, complete our restructuring quickly, and continue working hard to position American as a world-class competitor.

Another risk comes from within. Divisive and destructive rhetoric of the past has not served American or its people well, and indeed has only served to strengthen our competitors. Believe me, our competitors see an opportunity to take advantage of any internal uncertainty or instability. This is a moment when such discord can have profound consequences. It is time to turn the page and open a new chapter for American.

The world has changed around us and this is our moment to adapt or lose the opportunity forever. Our industry is now defined by the changes our competitors made in restructuring to secure their futures, and the landscape is littered with those airlines that failed to change. Only a successful, profitable, and growing American can provide a secure future and opportunity for our people.

We are moving fast and it will take all our dedication, focus, and energy to get this done – and I will give it all of mine. I thank you again for standing tall and doing a fine job for our customers during this especially challenging time. That winning attitude is why I believe we have what it takes to put American back on top.

Sincerely,

Tom

 

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on All Stories

Linda Young – AHN News Writer

Rochester, NY, United States (AHN) – Eastman Kodak Co. stock shares plunged 28 percent in value on speculation that the 131-year-old photography company is preparing to seek bankruptcy protection.

Kodak once ranked among America’s largest corporations. The former blue chip company once attracted engineers, scientists and Ph.D.’s from around the world eager to work on the latest in imaging technology at its Rochester, New York headquarters. At its peak, Kodak employed 145,000 people worldwide.

Shares dropped 18 cents to a record low of 47 cents per share after the Wall Street Journal published a report speculating Kodak might seek Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The report was fueled by an announcement last year that Kodak needed to raise cash to continue operating in 2012 and also by its struggle to sell some key assets.

The news caused retirees to worry about the future of their benefits.

A bankruptcy filing would allow the company to continue to operate and could come within the next month or so.

Kodak has several billion dollars worth of assets, including more than 1,000 patents it could sell to raise cash. But it takes time to find buyers and complete sales.

In the meantime, the company is reportedly seeking a loan.

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

Windsor Genova – AHN News News Writer

Renton, WA, United States (AHN) – One-third of the 28,000-strong Boeing workers in Washington, Oregon and Kansas voted Wednesday to accept a four-year extension of their job contract to build 737 MAX planes.

Tom Wroblewski, Local 751 district president of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers (IAM), praised the approval.

“As a result of this vote, we have the strongest commitment to the future of aerospace jobs in Washington state that we’ve ever had. We’ve also preserved retiree medical and pensions for new hires. Those are things that very few working people in America have today,” he said in a message posted on iam751.org.

The extension of the contract expiring in September 2012 was welcomed by the aircraft maker.

“This contract will help secure a better future for our employees, our customers, our communities and our company,” said Jim Albaugh, president and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, in the company’s website. “It’s a balanced agreement that makes us more competitive and ensures that the 737 – the best single-aisle airplane in the world – continues to be built by the people who know how to do it best.”

Boeing announced last week that the company would produce the 737 MAX in the existing Renton facility if IAM members ratified the tentative agreement.

According to Boeing, the new contract provides for annual wage and pension increases; a one-time ratification bonus of $5,000 to be paid on Dec. 15; productivity, quality and safety incentives; a new health care plan; and a joint panel to discuss labor-management issues.

Washington state also stands to gain from the extended contract as it will keep 8,000 direct jobs and 12,000 indirect jobs not to mention $500 million in annual tax payment from Boeing.

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on Labor Stories

Bank of America Corp., the second- biggest U.S. lender by assets, agreed to sell almost all of its remaining China Construction Bank Corp. stake after divesting about 13 billion shares in August to bolster capital.

View full post on Finance Stories

The Media Line Staff

Palestinian Territory David Rosenberg / The Med – Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian Authority (PA) president, was on a roll last spring and summer, announcing with great fanfare plans to end the Hamas-Fatah rift and to seek recognition of statehood in the United Nations. Israel was livid and the United States scrambled to create a blocking majority against statehood in the Security Council.

But now the grand strategy seems to be unraveling.

Last week, Palestinians officials admitted off the record that the statehood bid in the Security Council was dead in the water, although the PA might still push for a symbolic vote in the General Assembly. Unity talks have stalled for now on the composition of a joint cabinet of technocrats and personal animosities.

Abbas won Palestinian admission to the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) by a thumping majority and to the thunderous applause of delegates. But membership came at the cost of the organization’s losing its U.S. funding, prompting UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and other officials to call on the Palestinians to refrain from trying to join other international bodies.

Nevertheless, observers of the Palestinian scene say that as much as his strategy is dead-ended, Abbas, popularly known as Abu Mazen, has emerged as an unlikely hero in the Palestinian street. He is seen now as a leader who brought the Palestinian cause back to the world stage and had the gumption to say ‘no’ to the U.S.

“He did his best. He didn’t buckle under tremendous pressure. People give him credit for that. They don’t blame him for the failure,” Daoud Kuttab, a Palestinian journalist and analyst, told The Media Line. “His personal standing has improved.”

Abbas’ standing is critical as he engages in an ideological battle with the Hamas movement in Gaza. Together with the failure to get peace talks with Israel off the ground, his statehood setback has undermined his case for creating a Palestinian state through diplomacy and has given Hamas more evidence that its strategy for so-called armed resistance is the only choice.

Palestinians are not of one mind about how to pursue the goal of a state. A September opinion poll by the Harry S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace and the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research found that 83 percent of the Palestinians supported the drive for statehood via the UN. But just over a quarter of the respondents said they supported armed attacks on the Israeli army and Jewish settlers as a way of forcing Israel out of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Last spring, Abbas’ prospects looked promising. Negotiations with Israel never got off the ground despite heavy pressure from the Obama administration, but the onus for the talks’ failure was placed by most on the government of Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. The Palestinian economy was booming and the West Bank and Gaza were spared the mass protests exploding across the Middle East.

In April, Egypt brokered the terms for Abbas’ Fatah movement to begin national unity talks with Hamas to end a four-year-old rift that had been extremely unpopular in the Palestinian street. Not long afterwards the PA formally unveiled its bid for statehood and insisted it would settle for nothing less than a Security Council approval. It lobbied hard around the world and won seals of approval for good governance from the UN and International Monetary Fund.

The Palestinians were admitted to UNESCO Oct. 31 in a vote of 107 in favor to 14 against (52 abstained). But in the Security Council, the Palestinians have failed to get the minimum nine votes out of 15 they need. Meanwhile, a Security Council admission committee was unable last week to formulate an agreed stance concerning the Palestinian bid for full UN membership.

Ido Zelkovitz, a lecturer in Middle Eastern history at Israel’s Haifa University, said Abbas had nevertheless scored some important victories along the way.

“The Palestinians won UNESCO membership despite the fact that the Americans opposed it and cut off funding to the organization. That was quite an achievement internationally,” Zelkovitz told The Media Line.

In doing battle with Washington, the Palestinian leader won favor in public opinion by articulating a widely held view among Palestinians that America is an imperialist power that is incorrigibly pro-Israel. Abbas also raised the Palestinian profile at a time when Arab Spring turmoil had directed attention to places like Libya and Syria.

“In last years what was the biggest problem of the Palestinians?” he said. “It was that no one listened to them because the West Bank was quiet and economy was thriving. No one was paying attention to them.”

National unity talks are showing signs of thawing. On Monday, Salam Fayyad, the PA prime minister and a figure loathed by many in Hamas, signaled that he was prepared to step aside if that would bring the two movements together. Abbas is due to hold face-to-face talks in Cairo this month with his arch-rival, the exiled Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal.

Zelkovitz said he is skeptical that Hamas and Fatah will be able to put aside their differences, or more importantly, agree to share the financial resources of the Palestine Liberation Organization. Indeed, Abbas and Fatah leaders fear Hamas might try to wrench control of the PLO from them. But Kuttab is more sanguine.

While Abbas will not resort to violence, he still retains options to pursue his agenda through diplomatic and political means, Kuttab said. The Security Council rotates its non-permanent members every six months and the Palestinians can wait until “the magic nine” votes they need emerge.

“Abu Mazen has instructed his team to look for other options to the UN statehood and independence,” he said. “He’s against violence, so that is off the table. That increases the need for national unity, the need to work for massive non-violent protests and to take advantage of the 100-plus countries that support Palestine to encourage them in a boycott divestment campaign against Israel.”

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on All Stories

UAW ratifies deal with Ford

Linda Young – AHN News Writer

Detroit, MI, United States (AHN) – United Auto Workers approved a new four-year labor agreement with Ford Motor, UAW officials announced on Wednesday.

As recently as this weekend, 53 percent of the 41,000 Ford UAW rank and file members were voting no to the contract.

However, that changed when the locals voted. The final tally was 63 percent of production workers and 65 percent of skilled-trades workers voting yes to the deal.

UAW President Bob King had urged the members to approve the deal, saying they could not expect anything any better. Moreover, he said it was important to approve the deal because it brought jobs back to the United States that currently are held by nonunion labor in Mexico and overseas.

Ford is the most profitable automaker in the country. Ford CEO Alan Mulally received stock from the company in 2010 worth an estimated $54.5 million, which drew criticism from King. Auto workers, like many other Americans, are angry over the income disparity in the nation.

Although the new deal does little to raise worker’s pay, along with bringing some jobs back to America the contract also calls for Ford to invest an additional $4.8 billion in new products and equipment at U.S. plants.

The contract is worth nearly 6,000 more jobs on top of the 7,000 jobs that Ford officials had already announced they would add.

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on Labor Stories

Tejinder Singh – AHN News Correspondent

Washington, D.C., United States (AHN) – President Barack Obama on Thursday shelved his policy of diplomatic negotiations as he noted his administration’s goal to make “sure that they (Iranians) pay a price,” while seeking to “isolate” Iran — not only over the alleged assassination plot, but over its nuclear program and ties to terrorism.

Addressing a joint press conference with visiting South Korean president Lee Myung Bak at the White House, Obama refused to say explicitly whether he believed Iran’s leaders knew about a plot to assassinate the Saudi Arabian ambassador in Washington, but the Iranians should be held accountable in any event, reiterated Obama.

“Even if at the highest levels there was not detailed operational knowledge, there has to be accountability with respect to anybody in the Iranian government engaging in this kind of activity,” Obama said.

President asserted himself when he replied to one conservative channel correspondent saying, “Well I did not know you were the spokesman for Romney.”

Smiling Obama answered when he was asked if he considered the alleged Iranian assassination plot to be “an act of war.”

The journalist framed his question citing Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney as saying earlier, “what specific steps will you take to hold Iran accountable? Especially when Mitt Romney charged last week, quote, ‘If you do not want America to be the strongest nation on Earth, I am not your President. You have that president today.’”

On the recent nod from U.S. Congress for the free trade agreement with Korea, President Lee said he is confident Korean parliament will ratify the deal soon.

“I am confident that the Korea National Assembly will soon ratify this very important agreement in the near future,” Lee said. “It is a win-win agreement that will benefit both of our economies in countless ways.”

Calling the FTA an “historic milestone,” Lee said the countries have set an example of job creation and economic growth through free trade.

Highlighting the ongoing concern in Europe, Lee noted the global economy’s present challenges, saying, “the Korea-US Free Trade Agreement will demonstrate to the world that we can create good quality jobs and stimulate growth through open and fair trade.”

Obama summed up the agreement effect as, “In short, this agreement will boost American exports by up to $11 billion and support some 70,000 American jobs.”

The occasion was also used by Obama to warn North Korea, saying, “If Pyongyang continues to ignore its international obligations, it will invite even more pressure and isolation.”

“If the North abandons its quest for nuclear weapons and moves toward denuclearization, it will enjoy greater security and opportunity for its people,” Obama offered as a choice for North Korea.

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on Economy, Business And Finance Stories

Tejinder Singh – AHN News Correspondent

Washington, DC, United States (AHN) – President Barack Obama on Monday announced his recommendations to lawmakers for fiscal moves to enhance revenue flow into the government coffers while reducing the deficit.

Addressing a select audience of around 200 along with journalists on the outer circle in Rose Garden, Obama exhibited the passion and language of a political campaign, lambasting his opposition as he outlined his initial submission to the deficit reduction bipartisan Super Committee with ambitious plans to cut trillions from the national debt, with nearly half of the reductions from tax increases.

Obama described his proposals as a “plan that reduces our debt by more than $4 trillion, and achieves these savings in a way that is fair — by asking everybody to do their part so that no one has to bear too much of the burden on their own.”

“All I’m saying is that those who have done well, including me, should pay their fair share in taxes,” Obama said, cautioning lawmakers that he would veto any legislation “that puts all the burden on closing the deficit on ordinary Americans.”

Obama went down the Bush-era memory lane, saying, “During this past decade, profligate spending in Washington, tax cuts for multi-millionaires and billionaires, the cost of two wars, and the recession turned a record surplus into a yawning deficit, and that left us with a big pile of IOUs.”

Reacting to Republicans’ weekend comments calling his proposals “class warfare,” Obama said, “This is not class warfare. It’s math.”

On Sunday, Republican Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee and a strong advocate of deep cuts but no tax rises, labeled Obama’s plans as “class warfare.”

Amid laughter in the Rose Garden Monday, the president added, “The money is going to have to come from some place. And if we’re not willing to ask those who’ve done extraordinarily well to help America close the deficit and we are trying to reach that same target of $4 trillion, then the logic, the math says everybody else has to do a whole lot more: We’ve got to put the entire burden on the middle class and the poor. We’ve got to scale back on the investments that have always helped our economy grow. We’ve got to settle for second-rate roads and second-rate bridges and second-rate airports, and schools that are crumbling.”

In his plan outlining the tax increases to get more money into American coffers, Obama called upon the wealthy and corporations to pay their “fair share” to cut the deficit. “Middle-class families shouldn’t pay higher taxes than millionaires and billionaires,” he said. “It’s hard to argue against that.”

Obama’s proposal, now termed the “Buffett rule,” would make Americans who earn more than $1 million pay the same rate of tax as those who earn less. The proposal got its name from billionaire financier Warren Buffett, who recently said that he and his wealthy peers pay relatively less tax than the people who work for them by benefiting from tax loopholes that see earnings on investment taxed at lower rates than wages.

Among other proposals, some $250 billion of spending on Medicare – the healthcare program for the elderly would be cut. There is a condition: Obama would veto any bill from the lawmakers on the subject if it did not include new taxes on the rich.

The latest Rose Garden address is part of a series of proposals being churned out by the White House to streamline efforts to do deficit reduction and inject health into a sluggish American economy reeling under high employment rates and rising poverty levels.

Article © AHN – All Rights Reserved

View full post on All Stories